Cleary et al v. HiteResearcherMonique F. UlyssesResearcherLauren ChalaturnykMetadata authorConnell ParishMetadata authorGordon Lyall
See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Saskatchewan Court of King's Bench.
Western Weekly Reports.
1921.
LOI Navigation TaxonomyTaxonomy for site navigationCollectionsLegal CasesLOI Document Type TaxonomyTaxonomy of document typesDatasetsA created or derived dataset.Legal Case FileResponsibility TaxonomyMetadata AuthorA team member responsibile for authoring and researching parts of a metadata record, outside of the context of the holding institution.ResearcherA person or organization responsibile for performing research.Added navigation taxonomy value loiCollectionLegalCases using XSLT.Migrated file from RADish/LegalCaseReports/legal_case_1921_3_wwr_130.xml using XSLT.
The plaintiffs lodged an appeal demanding compensation for the destruction of their flax crop by the defendant’s cattle. The District Court Judge who handled the case at bar ordered a new trial. Justice McKay determined that that order would be set aside. The plaintiff’s action was dismissed, with costs, and the defendant was “entitled to the costs” of the appeal.
PlaintiffsClearyDefendantsHiteAppellantsHiteRespondentsClearyJudgesJustice of CanadaMcKay