Fujita and Company, Limited (Plaintiff) Respondent v. Northern Fruit Company, Limited (Defendant) AppellantResearcherMonique F. UlyssesResearcherLauren ChalaturnykMetadata authorConnell ParishMetadata authorGordon Lyall
See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
Western Weekly Reports.
1922.
LOI Navigation TaxonomyTaxonomy for site navigationCollectionsLegal CasesLOI Document Type TaxonomyTaxonomy of document typesDatasetsA created or derived dataset.Legal Case FileResponsibility TaxonomyMetadata AuthorA team member responsibile for authoring and researching parts of a metadata record, outside of the context of the holding institution.ResearcherA person or organization responsibile for performing research.Added navigation taxonomy value loiCollectionLegalCases using XSLT.Migrated file from RADish/LegalCaseReports/legal_case_1923_1_wwr_59.xml using XSLT.
The defendant company appealed a judgement by a District Court Judge regarding an action for damages and an accusation that they had breached a contract between the two parties. The plaintiffs had discussed a sale of oranges to the defendants and drawn up and signed a formal contract. The Northern Fruit Company, Limited, objected to the contract’s terms and refused to sign. Fujita and Company, Limited, asserted that the informal correspondence constituted a contract. Chief Justice Haultain and Justices Turgeon, McKay, and Martin determined that the defendants were not bound by any contract and within their rights to reject the formal document presented to them. The appeal was allowed, with costs, and the action of the plaintiff dismissed, again, with costs.
PlaintiffsFujita and CompanyDefendantsNorthern Fruit CompanyAppellantsNorthern Fruit CompanyRespondentsFujita and CompanyJudgesChief Justice of SaskatchewanHaultainJustice of AppealTurgeonJustice of AppealMcKayJustice of AppealMartin