Rex vs. Edward Brian Briscoe
Description
Title Proper | F0 GR0419 BOX 569 FILE 155B |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1947 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
Edison Brian Briscoe was charged on 26 July 1947 at Rivers Inlet with possessing a stolen boat, alleged to have previously been known as the "Rio
II" and sold several times before being stolen from Matt Nybo and James Barnett and
renamed "Guess Who." Briscoe was found guilty and appealed the case, claiming that
new evidence would prove that the "Guess Who" and "Rio II" were different boats. File
is relevant because the Rio II was originally named "S.N." under licence 3271 when
it was purchased by British Columbia Packers Ltd. from the Japanese Fishing Vessels Disposal Committee on 11 May 1942. File is very disorganized, documents presented in original order.
It is recommended that researchers begin by reading the transcript on page 123 before
returning to previous documents. See also bca_gr_0419_box_569_file_155a.
PDF Table of Contents: Pages 2-3 Information and Complaint, 28 July 1947. Page 4 Statement
of the Accused, 26 July 1947. Pages 5-21 Preliminary Hearing, 1-2 August, 1947. Pages
22-25 Affidavit from Briscoe’s counsel Philip Sutton Marsden, 31 December 1947, affirming
basic facts of case, granting of appeal based on evidence from Helmer Miller Hanna,
requesting that new trial take place in Vancouver rather than Prince Rupert and that
the ‘Guess Who’ be transported to Vancouver. Pages 26-28 Court schedules indicate
Rex vs. Briscoe heard before Justice Manson February 16-25, with a verdict of guilty.
Pages 29-35 Photos of Briscoe’s other boat, the Joker, featuring licence number. Pages
36-40 Annotated Affidavit from Helmer Miller Hanna, 2 December 1947, swearing that
he witnessed previous owner John Goch’s sons remove ‘Rio II’ from Seacraft Marine,
Coal Harbour in December 1946. Lists alleged differences between the ‘Rio II’ and
‘Guess Who’. Pages 41-43 Motion by appellant for new evidence, in which Briscoe differentiates
between the ‘Rio II’ and ‘Guess Who’. Page 44 Statement by previous owner John Goch,
11 February 1948. Page 45 Note describing Briscoe’s trouble with the Canadian Fishing
Co., Clay’s Wharf, and the fate of Briscoe’s boat the ‘ Joker’, 20 February 1948.
Pages 46-62 Direct Examination of Albert Edward Lawson, credit manager for the B.C.
Packers, who describes purchase of Rio II for 1300$ from the Japanese Fishing Vessels
Disposal Committee when it was originally registered under licence 3271 under the
name ’S.N’. It was initially renamed the ‘Mary S. and assigned licence 7387. The boat
was eventually sold to Barnett and Nybo for $3350. Pages 63-80 Direct examination
of Helmer Miller Hanna, 17 December 1947, contains further descriptions of the vessel.
Page 81-92 Exhibits: condition sale agreement for ‘Mary S.’ for F.W. Turner of Ladner
on 12 May 1942 (boat valued at $1300), condition sale agreement for ‘Rio II’ for John
Goch of Steveston on 20 March 1944 (boat valued $2400), photographs of boat. Pages
92-93 Letter from Assistant Crown Counsel to Briscoe’s counsel, P.S. Marsden, regarding
witnesses and evidence, 13 February 1948. Pages 94-97 Letter to H.R. Bray from Crown
Counsel F.D. Pratt, 16 January 1948, enclosing order to change venue of trial from
Prince Rupert to Vancouver. Pages 98-101 Letter to Bray from Pratt, 14 January 1948,
enclosing Wilson’s order and a letter from Marsden regarding transport of boat to
Vancouver. Page 102 Radiogram 6 December 1947 from officer of the court in Vancouver
to Revelstoke counterpart asking if John Goch and sons can be reached to confirm existence
of 2 boats named ‘Rio’ and answer charges that his sons removed ‘Rio II’ from Vancouver
dock on 8 December 1946 as per Helmer Miller Hanna. Page 103 Radiogram 8 December
1947 Reply from Revelstoke with answers from John Goch and his sons regarding their
whereabouts at time of alleged removal of the ‘Rio II’. Page 104 Radiogram 11 December
1947 from Vancouver officer to Revelstoke officer with questions regarding Goch’s
son’s whereabouts on day of alleged removal. Page 105 Radiogram 11 December 1947 from
Revelstoke to Vancouver with Norman Goch’s answers regarding his whereabouts on dates
in question. Page 106 Oath from James William Barnett describing difference between
the ‘Rio’ and ‘Rio II’. Page 107 Statement from Harvey Roy Hurst, 11 December 1947,
attesting that referred Briscoe to Helmer Miller Hanna. Page 108 letter from Inspector
F. Swanson to counsel for the respondent G.V. Pelton, 9 December 1947 regarding Phillip
Goch’s time card at Imperial Cannery on 8 December 1946 and affidavits from Jon and
Phillip Goch. Page 109 Notice of motion from Marsden, 3 December 1947 to introduce
fresh evidence; the affidavits of Briscoe, Harvey Roy Hurst, Helmer Miller Hanna,
and Mary Margaret Oliver. Pages 110-116 Affidavit from Mary Margaret Oliver, 3 December
1947, includes exhibits A-E, documents procured from Registrar of Shipping and Collector
of Customs and Excise at Port of New Westminster. Pages 117-119 Affidavit from Briscoe,
3 December 1947 describing new evidence. Pages 120-122 Order allowing appeal and directing
a new trial with registration of dissent from Judge Sidney Smith. Pages 123-142 Preliminary
Hearing. Page 143 Statement from Mr. Yardley, Assistant registrar of shipping for
Victoria, 20 September 1947. Page 144 Notes on ‘Rio II’.
|
Name of creator |
The Provincial Government of British Columbia created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized in full.
|
Structure
Repository | British Columbia Archives |
Fonds | Government Records Collection |
Series | Attorney General |
Sub-series | F0 GR0419 BOX 569 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (20K)
Download Standalone XML (24K)
Title
Rex vs. Edward Brian Briscoe
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: British Columbia Archives
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.