Correspondence on the Public Documents Disposal Act
Description
Title Proper | F0 GR0530 BOX 11 FILE L-7B |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1943 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
Correspondence between the Attorney General’s office and the Deputy Provincial Secretary on which documents they submit to be destroyed. The documents listed are record books,
summons, receipt books, cheques, correspondence, and files related to various licences
and other miscellaneous files. There are several court cases listed from the 1930s;
among these are several labeled with Japanese names: Norfolk Paper Co. vs. Himatsu,
Hasegawa vs. McKenzie, Yoshida vs. Do, Layritz Nurseries Ltd. Vs. Nishimura, Brown
vs. Miyata, Harry vs. Nishimaru, Rolph Clark Stone Ltd. Vs. Ebisuzaki, C.H. Cates
& Sons Ltd. Vs. Ikeda, Nikaido vs. Grossman, B.C. Advertisers Ltd. Vs. Nakatami, Haskins
& Elliott Ltd. Vs. Yanagisawa, Wiese vs. Sawazkie et al, Do vs. Mishimura, and MacDonalds
– Consolidated vs. Watanabe.
|
Name of creator |
The Provincial Government of British Columbia created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized selectively.
|
Structure
Repository | British Columbia Archives |
Fonds | Government Records Collection |
Series | Deputy Provincial Secretary |
Sub-series | F0 GR0530 BOX 11 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Correspondence on the Public Documents Disposal Act
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: British Columbia Archives
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.