Correspondence between Child Welfare and British Columbia Security Commission
Description
Title Proper | F0 GR0883 BOX 04 FILE 08 |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1942 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
Correspondence between lawyer R.J. McMaster and Superintendent of Child Welfare Ruby McKay regarding Teruaki Tamura and Sadan Shimoji, two boys who did not want to sign on for exile; Memo from Assistant Deputy Provincial Secretary E.W. Griffith, advising Director of Welfare C.W. Lundy to refer all questions concerning
this matter to the federal department; Letter from McKay concerning the separation
of Japanese children from their families during "repatriation" process in which she
states that this is “contrary to the principles of child welfare”; Letter to McKay
from McMaster regarding Tamura and Shimoji cases; Letter from BCSC General Manager W.A. Eastwood to Superintendent of Neglected Children Isobel Harvey
regarding Japanese children without guardianship; Letter from BCSC secretary W. Morrison
to Harvey regarding initial incarceration in April 1942.
|
Name of creator |
The Provincial Government of British Columbia created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized in full.
|
Structure
Repository | British Columbia Archives |
Fonds | Government Records Collection |
Series | Child Welfare |
Sub-series | F0 GR0883 BOX 04 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Correspondence between Child Welfare and British Columbia Security Commission
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: British Columbia Archives
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.