FIle 11: Japanese in Canada (4 of 6)
Description
Title Proper | MG31-E87 VOLUME 01 FILE 11 |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1942 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file, maintained by R.G. Robertson, includes correspondence and records pertaining to the deportation of Japanese Canadians
and Japanese nationals. It includes the following: the Supreme Court Reference Case on the Validity of Orders-in-Council; copies of P.C. 7355, 7356, 7357,
10773; correspondence on discussions of Deportation Order in Cabinet in December 1945;
discussions of inquiring into "loyalty" of Japanese citizens; on draft recommendations
to council for deportation and revocation of naturalization and citizenship; surveys
on applications for "repatriation"; correspondence on the proposed loyalty commission;
copy of P.C. 5637; the brief submitted by the CCJC regarding the "repatriation" of Japanese Canadians; and correspondence pertaining
to an exchange of nationals policy.
|
Name of creator |
Robertson, Gordon, 1917-2013
, public servant, created this archive and gave it to the LAC in 1991.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized in full.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Gordon Robertson Fonds |
Series | MG31-E87 VOLUME 01 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
FIle 11: Japanese in Canada (4 of 6)
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.