File 161407, Part 1: War Claims Commission Claims Against the Custodian of Enemy Property War Claims Commission. Judges Act s37. [1946-1958].
Description
Title Proper | RG13 VOLUME 2883 FILE 161407-1 |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1946 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file contains records concerning the War Claims Commission and its establishment to handle claims raised against the Custodian of Enemy Property from 1946 to 1958. Included are discussions regarding the following: the settlement
of claims by Canadian prisoners of war; the distribution of funds collected from Eastern
European governments; the development of the War Claims fund from Custodian-held property/assets as a form of reparations post-war; claims of missionaries and
religious organizations; the establishment of the Commission to compensate for losses
incurred during the war of non–Japanese Canadians; claims of Federal departments;
the responsibilities and per diems of Commissioners (including Commissioner Bird); the appointment of Commissioners; and Commissioner Bird’s expenses from Japanese Property Claims Commission.
|
Name of creator |
Canada. Department of Justice
created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized selectively.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Department of Justice Fonds |
Series | RG13 VOLUME 2883 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
File 161407, Part 1: War Claims Commission Claims Against the Custodian of Enemy Property
War Claims Commission. Judges Act s37. [1946-1958].
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.