RG2 A-1-A Volume 1925 File 3362G (PC 1946-45)
Description
Title Proper | RG2 A-1-A VOLUME 1925 FILE 3362G (PC 1946-45) |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1946 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file contains Order-in-Council PC 1946-45, dated 08 January 1946. PC 1946-45
relates to the legal action taken by Utaka Shimoyama and Yae Nasu against the Attorney General of Canada in response to Orders-in-Council PC 1945-7355,
1945-7356, and 1945-7357 and the following Order-in-Council PC 1945-7414 which made
all actions taken under the War Measures Act legal under the National Emergency Transitional
Powers Act, 1945. Specifically, this Order-in-Council referred the following question
to the Supreme Court of Canada, therefore beginning the process that lead to the famous Reference Re Persons of
the Japanese Race case: "Are the Orders in Council, dated the 15th day of December,
1945, being PC 1945-7355, 1945-7356, and 1945-7357, ultra vires of the Governor in
Council either in whole or in part and, if so, in what particular or particulars and
to what extent?"
|
Name of creator |
Canada. Privy Council Office
created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized selectively.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Privy Council Office Fonds |
Series | Orders-in-Council Series |
Sub-series | RG2 A-1-A VOLUME 1925 (PC 1946-45) |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
RG2 A-1-A Volume 1925 File 3362G (PC 1946-45)
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.