Yamake Family Legal Documents

Yamake Family Legal Documents

Description

Title Proper Yamake Family Legal Documents
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized 1928–1942
General material designation
From this file, LOI has digitized 7 textual records and other records.
Scope and content
The documents include: A BC Security Commission Permit for Junzo Yamake to remain at 359 Powell Street for two weeks, March 27, 1942. Income Tax Notice of Assessment for Junzo Yamake, April 28, 1943. In envelope. A letter, in Japanese, issued by the Japanese Merchants Association, March 25, 1942. A letter in Japanese regarding orders by the BC Security Commission, Asset Management Division. A letter, in Japanese, issued by the BC Security Commission. Attached is a notice, in English regarding the salery amounts for Japanese internees at internment camps and work projects. A Statement and Declaration to the Bulk Sales Act showing creditors of Seichiro Aoiki, confectioner of 359 Powell Street, Vancouver, BC, 1928. A letter addressed to the British Columbia Retailers, titled, "... And now, what next?" Written by George Matthews, BC Board, Retail Merchants Association of Canada, 1938.
Name of creator
Junzo Yamake came to Canada from Ubikiyama, Shiga Ken at the age of twenty five. He apprenticed as a baker under Mr. Hayashi until he could open his own shop in 1927. He married Hatsuye Nishimura in 1928 and began a family.
Immediate source of acquisition
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective between 2014 and 2018.

Metadata

Title

Yamake Family Legal Documents
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.

Terminology

Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.