Yamake Family Legal Documents
Description
Title Proper | Yamake Family Legal Documents |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1928–1942 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized 7 textual records and other records.
|
Scope and content |
The documents include: A BC Security Commission Permit for Junzo Yamake to remain
at 359 Powell Street for two weeks, March 27, 1942. Income Tax Notice of Assessment
for Junzo Yamake, April 28, 1943. In envelope. A letter, in Japanese, issued by the
Japanese Merchants Association, March 25, 1942. A letter in Japanese regarding orders
by the BC Security Commission, Asset Management Division. A letter, in Japanese, issued
by the BC Security Commission. Attached is a notice, in English regarding the salery
amounts for Japanese internees at internment camps and work projects. A Statement
and Declaration to the Bulk Sales Act showing creditors of Seichiro Aoiki, confectioner
of 359 Powell Street, Vancouver, BC, 1928. A letter addressed to the British Columbia
Retailers, titled, "... And now, what next?" Written by George Matthews, BC Board,
Retail Merchants Association of Canada, 1938.
|
Name of creator |
Junzo Yamake
came to Canada from Ubikiyama, Shiga Ken at the age of twenty five. He apprenticed
as a baker under Mr. Hayashi until he could open his own shop in 1927. He married
Hatsuye Nishimura in 1928 and began a family.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
|
Structure
Repository | Nikkei National Museum |
Fonds | Yamake Family fonds |
Series | Yamake Family documents |
Digital Objects (7)
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Yamake Family Legal Documents
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Nikkei National Museum
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.