Appeal Cases Heard Before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Description
Title Proper | Appeal Cases Heard Before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1944-1994 |
General material designation |
From this fonds, LOI has digitized 6 textual records or images.
|
Scope and content |
This fonds comprises six files containing records of appeal cases heard before the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, including the following: The King-Emperor (Appeal No. 1 of 1944) v Benoari Lal Sarma
and others (India); The King-Emperor (Appeal No. 44 of 1944) v Sibnath Banerji and
others (India); The King-Emperor (Appeal No. 83 of 1945) v Vimlabai Deshpande and
another (Nagpur); The Co-operative Committee on Japanese Canadians and another (Appeal No. 46 of 1946) v The Attorney-General of Canada and another
(Canada); Eliezer Zabrovsky (Appeal No. 43 of 1946) v The General Officer Commanding Palestine
and another (Palestine); and Chittambaram (Appeal No. 89 of 1946) v The King-Emperor
(Rangoon).
|
Name of creator |
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC)
created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
|
Structure
Repository | The British Library |
Digital Objects (6)
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Appeal Cases Heard Before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: The British Library
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.