G.W. McPherson Report May 1938 - Canadian Pacific Railway. n.d.
Description
Title Proper | RG117 A-1 VOLUME 0036 FILE 483A |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1938 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file consists of a lengthy, detailed memorandum by G.W. McPherson for the "Custodian of Alien Enemy Property re: the Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Embargoed Common Shares and 6% Note Certificates." McPherson outlines the history of C.P.R. certificates (prior, during, and subsequent to WWI), provisions made after the Treaty
of Versailles, the release of C.P.R. certificates, the purchase of said certificates by the Custodian, the law relevant to the C.P.R. question, and the "Present Situation." Several appendices are also included which
have not been digitized. The memorandum "relates principally to the Dutch question,
although the whole problem is dealt with in a general way.”
|
Name of creator |
Canada. Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property
created this archive.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized selectively.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property Fonds |
Series | A-1 Office Files of the Custodian |
Sub-series | RG117 A-1 VOLUME 0036 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
G.W. McPherson Report May 1938 - Canadian Pacific Railway. n.d.
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.