Japanese Property Claims Commission: Correspondence 1948
Description
| Title Proper | RG117 A-3 Volume 2818 File 55908-6 | 
| Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1948 | 
| General material designation | From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image. | 
| Scope and content | This file contains documents and correspondence pertaining to the actions of the Office of the Custodian during the Bird Commission, including a list of Japanese Canadian claimants and their legal counsel and discussions
                                          about selecting translators. | 
| Name of creator | 
                                          
                                          	Canada. Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property
                                          	
                                           created this archive. | 
| Immediate source of acquisition | The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
                                          Collective between 2014 and 2018. This record was digitized selectively. | 
Structure
| Repository | Library and Archives Canada | 
| Fonds | Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property Fonds | 
| Series | A-3 Case files | 
| Sub-series | RG117 A-3 VOLUME 2818 | 
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
                              Download Standalone XML (16K)
                           Title
Japanese Property Claims Commission: Correspondence 1948
                        Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
                        Source: Library and Archives Canada
                        Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
                           Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
                           and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
                           of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
                           choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
                           See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.