British Columbia v Homma
In Re the Provincial Elections Act and In Re Tomey Homma, A Japanese, [1901] 8 BCR
76
This case is an appeal regarding whether the Legislature has the power to provide
that no Japanese is entitled to have his name placed on the Register of Voters or
to vote at any election. Majority opinion cited Union Colliery Company of British
Columbia, Limited v. Bryden (1899), A.C 580 as precedent, quoting: “the Legislature
of the Dominion is invested with exclusive authority in all matters which directly
concern the rights, privileges, and disabilities" of aliens resident in Canada, whether
naturalized or not “. The concurring opinion also cited Union Colliery Company of
British Columbia, Limited v. Bryden, and went on to state that political powers granted
by the Dominion Parliament to naturalized aliens could not be removed by the provincial
legislature. Also included is an allowance for leave to appeal to the Privy Council
Plaintiffs | |
Defendants |
British Columbia
|
Appellants |
British Columbia
|
Respondents | |
Judges |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (12K)
Title
British Columbia v Homma
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
British Columbia Supreme Court.
British Columbia Reports.
1901.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.