Re Kanamura
In Re Kanamura, [1904] 10 BCR 354
Kanamura applied for a mandamus after the Vancouver Licensing Board denied him a wholesale
liquor license. The Board refused Kanamura because “their policy was not to grant
licenses to Orientals.” (354) While one affidavit filed by a member of the Board stated
that the rejection was due to the “unfit” conditions of Kanamura’s business, this appears
to be fabricated; the case notes indicate that “he had not seen the premises until
after the application had been refused,” and that the license inspector had considered
the premises “all right for the business.” (355) Justice Irving dismissed Kanamura’s
request for a mandamus, asserting that “other opportunities have and will present
themselves” for him to make a new application to the Licensing Board. Chief Justice
Hunter did not grant the mandamus against the Board existing at the time of their
judgement. He did note that “the Court [was] of the opinion that every person in the
country is entitled to have his application heard.” (356)
Plaintiffs | |
Defendants |
Vancouver Licensing Board
|
Judges |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (8.0K)
Title
Re Kanamura
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
British Columbia Supreme Court.
British Columbia Reports.
1904.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.