Whitla v Toye

Whitla v Toye

Whitla v Toye, [1909] 10 WLR 89
Toye is accused of fraud and misrepresentation regarding the sale of 275 acres of fruit land near Slocan, British Columbia. Toye told the plaintiff that the land could be purchased for $35 an acre, but Toye himself could not take advantage of it, and encouraged Whitla to purchase the property. In fact, it could be acquired for $17 an acre. Further, the defendant is accused of giving a false description of the land’s facilities. MacDonald recommended the nullification of the purchasing agreement and the reimbursement of the plaintiff, including costs and interest.



Whitla v Toye


Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Manitoba Trial. Western Weekly Reports. 1909.


Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.