British Columbia Land and Investment Agency Ltd. v. Ishitaka
British Columbia Land Investment Agency Ltd. v Ishitaka, [1911] 45 SCR 302
This is an appeal from Ishitaka v. British Columbia Land and Investment Agency, Ltd.
(16 B.C.R. 299). The ‘plaintiff claimed damages for the wrongful seizure and sale
of his goods by the defendant [British Columbia Land and Investment Agency] assuming
to act in virtue of powers contained in a chattel mortgage’ (at 303). The case was
settled with an allowance of appeal with costs, although several of the justices dissented.
Plaintiffs | |
Defendants |
British Columbia Land and Investment Agency, Limited
|
Appellants |
British Columbia Land and Investment Agency, Limited
|
Respondents | |
Judges | |
Other |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (12K)
Title
British Columbia Land and Investment Agency Ltd. v. Ishitaka
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
Supreme Court of Canada.
Supreme Court Reports.
1911.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.