Nakata v Dominion Fire Insurance Co
Nakata v Dominion Fire Insurance Co, [1915] 21 DLR 26
This case revolved around Minnie Nakata’s attempt to procure fire insurance for her
business, a bawdy house. Initially she was sold insurance, which the company later
attempted to rescind without informing Minnie Nakata or her husband of having done
so. Though the case initially dealt with whether or not the insurance company had
truly cancelled the insurance, in truth it revolved around the morality of Minnie
Nakata’s business. The appeal was dismissed. Despite clearly having been about the
morality of not only the business, but the Nakatas as a couple, there is no reference
in regards to them being of Japanese descent in this case.
Plaintiffs | |
Defendants |
Dominion Fire Insurance Co
|
Appellants |
Dominion Fire Insurance Co
|
Respondents | |
Judges | |
Other |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (12K)
Title
Nakata v Dominion Fire Insurance Co
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
Alberta Supreme Court [Appellate Division].
Dominion Law Reports.
1915.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.