British Columbia (Attorney General) v Canada (Minister of Justice)
Re the Japanese Treaty Act, [1921] 56 DLR 69
This case involved an attempt by the British Columbia government to ban anyone of
Chinese or Japanese descent from entering into contracts, leases, or concessions with
the government, i.e., making it illegal to employ people of Japanese or Chinese descent
on Crown land and whether or not that was ultra vires in relation to a treaty between
England and Japan (applying to Canada through its connection to the United Kingdom).
Ultimately, the BCAC found that the legislation involved was ultra vires, but on the
basis of separation of powers rather than the existence of a treaty.
Plaintiffs |
British Columbia [Reference Case]
|
Defendants | |
Judges | |
Other |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (8.0K)
Title
British Columbia (Attorney General) v Canada (Minister of Justice)
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
British Columbia Court of Appeal.
Dominion Law Reports.
1920.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.