Rex v Clun
R v Clun, [1929] 1 DLR 194
Yee Clun and Yee Low were convicted by a justice of the peace for failing to make
a return to the collector of customs and excise showing the total amount of their
taxable sales and the tax payable thereon for the month of July 1928. No such offence
existed in the Special War Revenue Act, R.S.C. 1927, c. 179, and while the prosecution
alleged it existed within the regulations of that act, no such regulations were given
to the court. Justice Bigelow reversed the decision of the justice of the peace, finding
that the circumstantial evidence that such regulations existed was insufficient to
convict the defendants.
Plaintiffs |
The Crown
|
Defendants | |
Appellants | |
Respondents |
The Crown
|
Judges |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (8.0K)
Title
Rex v Clun
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
Saskatchwan Court of King's Bench.
Dominion Law Reports.
1928.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.