Davis v. Yoshida
                           Davis v Yoshida, [1931] 3 WWR 703
                           
                           
                              
                              
                                 
                                    
                                       
                              
                              
                           
                        
                        Davis appealed a decision made in Vancouver’s Small Debts Court dismissing an application
                              to appoint a receiver. The appellant and respondent both sought a decision regarding
                              the jurisdiction of the stipendiary magistrate who delivered that judgement. Justice
                              W.A. Macdonald determined that it was not possible to “order or direct the magistrate
                              to appoint a receiver,” and determined there would be “no costs to either party,”
                              dismissing the appeal. (706) F. Donnenworth stood for the plaintiff, N.C. Levin for
                              the defendant.
                           
                           | Plaintiffs | |
| Defendants | |
| Appellants | |
| Respondents | |
| Judges | 
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
                              Download Standalone XML (8.0K)
                           Title
Davis v. Yoshida
                        Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
                           Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
                           Metadata author: Connell Parish
                           Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
                        Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
                        Source: 
                              
                              British Columbia Supreme Court.
                              
                              Western Weekly Reports.
                              
                              1931.
                              
                              
                        Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
                           Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
                           and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
                           of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
                           choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
                           See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.