Young v Uchiyama (BCAC)

Young v Uchiyama (BCAC)

Young v Uchiyama, [1933] 48 BCR 55
The judgement of Judge Fisher is appealed, with G.M. Sloan standing for the defendant/appellant and C.W. Tysoe representing the plaintiff/respondent. Chief Justice Macdonald recommended dismissing the appeal; so did Justices Martin, McPhillips, and M.A. Macdonald. It is determined that the discharge of Takagishi on a nolle prosequi constituted a “judgement for the defendant,” entitling the accused to “recover from the prosecutor the costs incurred by him by reason of such indictment or information.”



Young v Uchiyama (BCAC)


Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: British Columbia Court of Appeal. British Columbia Reports. 1933.


Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.