Hanada v British Columbia Electric Railway Co.
Katsumi Hanada and Yoshio Hanada v British Columbia Electric Railway Company Limited,
[1939] 54 BCR 118
This case assigns blame for an accident that cost a “Japanese girl” of three years
of age her leg. The driver of the street car that struck her was deemed responsible
in the original trial, and damages of $15,000 were awarded. An appeal was raised,
with C.L. McAlpine and W.A. Riddell representing the appellant, J.R. Nicholson and
K.L. Yule the respondent. Chief Justice Martin allowed the appeal in part. He and
Justice O’Halloran concurred that the damages should be reduced to $10,000. Justice
M.A. Macdonald dissented, recommending dismissal. It is interesting to note that both
Macdonald’s and Martin’s comments refer to Funk v Pinkerton (unreported), a case wherein
a 62 year old man received $19,130 after an accident left him partially paralyzed.
Macdonald insisted that, given the award granted in that case, it “cannot consistently
be said that $15,000 is excessive” (123) in the case of “a child of parents in moderate
circumstances permanently disabled by the loss of a limb.” (122)
Plaintiffs | |
Defendants |
British Columbia Electric Railway Co
|
Appellants |
British Columbia
|
Respondents | |
Judges |
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (12K)
Title
Hanada v British Columbia Electric Railway Co.
Credits
Researcher: Monique F. Ulysses
Researcher: Lauren Chalaturnyk
Metadata author: Connell Parish
Metadata author: Gordon Lyall
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source:
British Columbia Court of Appeal.
British Columbia Reports.
1939.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.