Browse Archival Collections
The Archival Collections compilation is organized by original repositories. The table
shows how many archival levels exist in each repository’s structure to give a sense
of how large each holding is. Clicking a repository in the index will take visitors
to a collapsible list of the archival hierarchy starting at the highest level moving
to the lowest as each level is clicked. Each link takes the user to a page that shows
the metadata, archival structure, and all the digital objects that can be found within
that level. Some of the contents of this collection (Custodian Case Files; Fishing Vessel Request Letters; Protest Letters; and Appendix 5 and 10 of Suspicious Japanese Report) have been moved to their own specially curated collections but can be accessed through
this browse as well.
Clicking on a digital object link will open a page that has source details for the
object and the object itself that can be downloaded as either a .pdf or an .mp3 (depending
on the nature of the object). All pages have a sidebar navigation pane that shows
where in the structure hierarchy the page sits as well as a site navigation bar above.
In-text links typically produce pop-ups of information that are predominantly links
to other documents that share references to the link. For example, clicking
“Tashme”will launch a pop-up that lists other site records that reference
“Tashme”while individual names produce lists of similar names and other documents associated with that name.
Metadata
Download Original XML (8.0K)
Download Standalone XML (12K)
Title
Browse Archival Collections
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: No source; born digital.
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.