90392K (1932-08-29)

90392K (1932-08-29)

Title ID 1079
Title Code 90392K
Date 1932-08-29
Transfer Date 1932-08-12
Generation (Custodian) 0
Generate (Non-custodian) 0
Polluted Chain 0
Corrections
Notes
No consideration info available. "Lot 16 and the East half of Lot 15"
Traces
Document Notes???
16
15
Split Ownership
Property ID 156
Consideration
Declared Value
Market Value 250
Properties
Value per Metre (Source: Market Value) 0.44
Value per Metre (2016) 7.16
Value per Metre (2018) 7.44
Total Area 567.58
Extinguished Properties
Owners
The Royal Trust Company
626 Pender St W Vancouver BC
Joint Tenants
Sellers
Lawyers
Solicitor
Griffin, Montgomery & Smith Barristers & c.
502 Hastings St W Vancouver BC
Preceding Titles
Newer Titles
Nominal Sale True
Consideration
Consideration (2016) N/A
Consideration (2018) N/A
Declared Value
Declared Value (2018) N/A
Market Value 250
Market Value (2018) 4221
Japanese Buyers 0
Other Asian Buyers 0
Other Buyers 0
Institutional Buyers 2
Some Owners Japanese False
All Owners Japanese False
Some Owners from East Asia False
All Owners from East Asia False
Some Owners Other ??? False
All Owners Other ??? False
Has Human Owner False
Has Institutional Owner True
Has Custodian Owner False
Has VLA Owner ??? False
Japanese Sellers 0
Other Asian Sellers 0
Other Sellers 2
Institutional Sellers 0
Some Sellers Japanese False
All Sellers Japanese False
Some Sellers East Asia Other False
All Sellers East Asia Other False
Some Sellers Other True
All Sellers Other True
Has Human Seller True
Has Institutional Seller False
Has Custodian Seller False
Has VLA Seller False

Metadata

Title

90392K (1932-08-29)
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: ????

Terminology

Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.