B4291L (1974-01-24)

B4291L (1974-01-24)

Title ID 2779
Title Code B4291L
Date 1974-01-24
Transfer Date 1974-01-16
Generation (Custodian) 0
Generate (Non-custodian) 0
Polluted Chain 0
Transfer document refers to B4290B
Document Notes???
Lots 36, 37 and 38 of Block one;
Transfer B4290B also deals with Lots 31-35 inclusive
Split Ownership
Property ID
Consideration 210000
Declared Value 210000
Market Value
Value per Metre (Source: Market Value)
Value per Metre (2016)
Value per Metre (2018)
Total Area 0
Extinguished Properties
Abacus International Developers Ltd.
1105 Granville St Vancouver BC
Joint Tenants
Diamond Jim Enterprises Ltd
500-193 Hastings St E Vancouver BC
Notary Public
96 Kingsway Vancouver BC
Preceding Titles
Newer Titles
Nominal Sale False
Consideration 210000
Consideration (2016) 1078057
Consideration (2018) 1119717
Declared Value 210000
Declared Value (2018) 1119717
Market Value
Market Value (2018) N/A
Japanese Buyers 0
Other Asian Buyers 0
Other Buyers 0
Institutional Buyers 2
Some Owners Japanese False
All Owners Japanese False
Some Owners from East Asia False
All Owners from East Asia False
Some Owners Other ??? False
All Owners Other ??? False
Has Human Owner False
Has Institutional Owner True
Has Custodian Owner False
Has VLA Owner ??? False
Japanese Sellers 0
Other Asian Sellers 0
Other Sellers 0
Institutional Sellers 2
Some Sellers Japanese False
All Sellers Japanese False
Some Sellers East Asia Other False
All Sellers East Asia Other False
Some Sellers Other False
All Sellers Other False
Has Human Seller False
Has Institutional Seller True
Has Custodian Seller False
Has VLA Seller False



B4291L (1974-01-24)
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: ????


Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.