96444L (1944-02-05)

96444L (1944-02-05)

Title ID 3093
Title Code 96444L
Date 1944-02-05
Transfer Date 1944-01-25
Generation (Custodian) 0
Generate (Non-custodian) 2
Polluted Chain 0
The Sterling Trust Company of British Columbia in voluntary liquidation
Document Notes???
Split Ownership
Property ID
Consideration 2900
Declared Value
Market Value 2900
Value per Metre (Source: Consideration) 10.36
Value per Metre (2016) 144.31
Value per Metre (2018) 149.89
Total Area 280.01
Extinguished Properties
Lin On Co-operative Association
232 Main St Vancouver BC
Joint Tenants
The Sterling Trust Company of British Columbia
751 Dunsmuir St Vancouver BC
Barrister and Solicitor
502-16 Hastings St E Vancouver BC
Preceding Titles
Newer Titles
Nominal Sale False
Consideration 2900
Consideration (2016) 40409
Consideration (2018) 41970
Declared Value
Declared Value (2018) N/A
Market Value 2900
Market Value (2018) 41970
Japanese Buyers 0
Other Asian Buyers 0
Other Buyers 0
Institutional Buyers 2
Some Owners Japanese False
All Owners Japanese False
Some Owners from East Asia False
All Owners from East Asia False
Some Owners Other ??? False
All Owners Other ??? False
Has Human Owner False
Has Institutional Owner True
Has Custodian Owner False
Has VLA Owner ??? False
Japanese Sellers 0
Other Asian Sellers 0
Other Sellers 0
Institutional Sellers 2
Some Sellers Japanese False
All Sellers Japanese False
Some Sellers East Asia Other False
All Sellers East Asia Other False
Some Sellers Other False
All Sellers Other False
Has Human Seller False
Has Institutional Seller True
Has Custodian Seller False
Has VLA Seller False



96444L (1944-02-05)
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: ????


Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.