Claims Commission, 1947-1951
Description
Title Proper | MG28-V1 VOLUME 2 FILE 11 |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1947 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file contains material pertaining to claimants of the Bird Commission. It includes the following: letters to claimants on behalf of the CCJC (dated 19 April 1949 and 18 November 1949) updating them as to the status of the
proceedings (i.e., what the Commission has decided regarding valuation and some legal
advice on whether or not the CCJC ought to vote to accept this judgment); an April 1950 report to claimants on what
had been decided regarding awards, how such had been decided, how the CCJC made its decisions regarding accepting or fighting for more awards, and so on; detailed
assessment not only of category claims (%) but also of different types of claims and
findings of fishing nets, vessels, cars, real estate, etc.; and a transparent CCJC budget.
|
Name of creator |
Co-operative Committee on Japanese Canadians Fonds.
created this archive. The originals are held at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized selectively.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Co-operative Committee on Japanese Canadians Fonds |
Series | MG28-V1 VOLUME 2 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Claims Commission, 1947-1951
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.