File 23-2-17-21, Part 1: Japanese Division. Segregation and Repatriation. Voluntary Repatriation. Plans. 1946/03-04.

File 23-2-17-21, Part 1: Japanese Division. Segregation and Repatriation. Voluntary Repatriation. Plans. 1946/03-04.

Description

Title Proper RG27 O1 VOLUME 0660 FILE 23-2-17-21-P1
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized 1946
General material designation
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
Scope and content
This file includes extensive correspondence, memoranda, and records from 1946 relating to the "voluntary repatriation," or deportation of Japanese Canadians and Japanese nationals, and the plans taken to carry out this policy. It includes: correspondence concerning the poor treatment of 'repatriates'; logistical considerations of the policies of relocation, repatriation, and the closing of internment sites and projects in British Columbia's interior (i.e. details of transportation, baggage restrictions, accommodations for individuals awaiting deportation); protest letters and petitions arguing against the treatment of those being deported (and memoranda and correspondence on these debated civil rights matters); discussions of conditions of deportation procedure (i.e. measles epidemic) often laid out in RCMP reports; discussions of limitations on travel for awaiting deportees (many held incommunicado); and further correspondence regarding arrangements for deportation (both on an individual and general basis).
Name of creator
Canada. Department of Labour created this archive.
Immediate source of acquisition
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective between 2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized in full.

Metadata

Title

File 23-2-17-21, Part 1: Japanese Division. Segregation and Repatriation. Voluntary Repatriation. Plans. 1946/03-04.
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.

Terminology

Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice. See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.