F.G. Shears Collection
Description
Title Proper | F.G. Shears Collection |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1941-1959 |
General material designation |
From this fonds, LOI has digitized 130 textual records or images.
|
Scope and content |
This fonds comprises seven series pertaining to the following: correspondence between
K.W. Wright and F.G. Shears; correspondence and reports pertaining to the scope, structure, operations, and staff
of the Office of the Custodian and the Japanese Property Claims Commission; the Bird Commission claim of Eikichi Kagetsu and the Deep Bay Logging Company; the Advisory Committee on Rural Properties; Department of National War Services intercepted correspondence and phone calls; various news clippings pertaining broadly
to the treatment and dispossession of Japanese Canadians in Canada and the anti-Japanese sentiment at the time; the Standing Committee on Public Accounts; "Trading with the Enemy" and "Defence of Canada" regulations; House of Commons of Canada debates; Orders-in-Council; the British Columbia Security Commission; and real estate agents in British Columbia.
|
Name of creator |
Shears, Frank Gould
created this archive during his role as director of the Vancouver branch of the office
of the Custodian of Enemy Property.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
|
Structure
Repository | Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library |
Digital Objects (126)
Metadata
Download Original XML (60K)
Download Standalone XML (68K)
Title
F.G. Shears Collection
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.