MG32-C26 Volume 1 File 26
Description
Title Proper | MG32-C26 Volume 1 File 26 |
Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1948 |
General material designation |
From this file, LOI has digitized one textual record or image.
|
Scope and content |
This file contains various correspondence from August 1948 pertaining to the following:
Bird Commission claims and their claimants, such as Takazo Watanabe, the Royston Lumber Company Limited; the Toronto Sub-Commission; requests by the Office of the Custodian for itemized lists of chattels to be provided
for Bird Commission claims; Custodian authorization for shipment of Japanese Canadian–owned property; N.M. Armstrong's
resignation from the Toronto General Trusts Corporation; questions surrounding the claims of limited companies; the schedule of Toronto hearings; the disposal of fishing vessels; corporation claims and cases; the economic
value of Japanese Canadian farms; expenses for travel related to the valuation of
property; the dissolution of the firm of Norris & MacLennan; and Co-operative Committee Claims funds.
|
Name of creator |
Brewin, Andrew, 1907-1983
, politician, created this archive and gave it to the LAC in 1976 and 1980.
|
Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research
Collective between 2014 and 2018.
The digitization level of this record is unknown.
|
Structure
Repository | Library and Archives Canada |
Fonds | Francis Andrew Brewin Fonds |
Series | MG32-C26 VOLUME 1 |
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
MG32-C26 Volume 1 File 26
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Library and Archives Canada
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.