Rosebery Report
Description
| Title Proper | Rosebery Report |
| Date(s) of material from this resource digitized | 1943 |
| General material designation |
From this item, LOI has digitized a textual record.
|
| Scope and content |
Item is a five-page report dated
February 12, 1943, sent to the Consul General of Spain from the Japanese
Nationals living in Rosebery, B.C. Report starts with the assertion that “It
is the solemn wish of both the Canadian born and the Naturalized Japanese to
be placed under your protection. Although they are actually Canadian
Citizens, they are accorded the same treatments and rights as the Japanese
Nationals. Therefor the Canadian-born Japanese and the Naturalized appeal to
you to protect their rights, their lives, and their properties, as you do
those of the Japanese Nationals.” The report first lists 11 points
(questions and concerns) of the Rosebery camp, including delays in receiving
mail, censorship, reimbursement, financial aid, sale of property,
protection, legal recourses, education, employment, among other things. The
report also includes more detailed points around maintenance rates,
improvement of labour conditions. housing conditions, fuel, women’s
employment, discrimination, health, education, and supervisors. |
| Name of creator |
Henry
Wakabayashi is the founder of Pacific Liaicon Ltd., he has helped many
major projects such as the Vancouver Sky Train, the expansion of the Vancouver
International Airport and the Metro Vancouver drinking water treatment program.
|
| Immediate source of acquisition |
The digital copies of the records
were acquired by the Landscapes of Injustice Research Collective between
2014 and 2018.
This record was digitized in full. |
Structure
Metadata
Download Original XML (12K)
Download Standalone XML (16K)
Title
Rosebery Report
Publication Information: See Terms of Use for publication and licensing information.
Source: Nikkei National Museum
Terminology
Readers of these historical materials will encounter derogatory references to Japanese
Canadians and euphemisms used to obscure the intent and impacts of the internment
and dispossession. While these are important realities of the history, the Landscapes
of Injustice Research Collective urges users to carefully consider their own terminological
choices in writing and speaking about this topic today as we confront past injustice.
See our statement on terminology, and related sources here.